Company discovery

Next-gen browser or OS-level agent startups founded after 2024

August 26, 2026 · $0.10 for both answers and the judge

Gemini 3.1 Pro wins

On August 26, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro and Grok 4.6 each wrote a company shortlist for the same brief, without seeing the other's answer. The judge, Claude Fable 5, read both twice, once in each order, and picked Gemini 3.1 Pro both times.

Why, in the judge's words“A delivers mostly real, verifiable early-stage agent startups with specific fit reasoning; B refuses and provides no actionable list.”

The two answers

Gemini 3.1 ProWinner
$0.039 · 31s · 3,266 tokens

Note: To avoid hallucinating fake companies, this list focuses on the absolute bleeding-edge 2024/early 2025 cohort of startups. Finding 10 real, traction-having companies founded strictly after December 31, 2024 is impossible without inventing them, so these represent the newest wave of verifiable companies in this exact thesis.

1. Steel (steel.dev) — An open-source browser API built specifically for AI agents to navigate, scrape, and interact with the web. Why it fits: YC S24 batch; strong early developer signal for providing the underlying headless browser infrastructure that other agent startups are building on top of.

2. LaVague — An open-source Large Action Model (LAM) framework that translates natural language into automated browser actions. Why it fits: Raised a seed round in mid-2024; massive GitHub traction for their approach of combining neuro-symbolic AI with web agents to bypass brittle CSS selectors.

3. Anon (anon.com) — Identity and authentication infrastructure that allows AI agents to log into websites and take actions on behalf of users. Why it fits: Emerged from stealth in 2024 with backing from Greylock; solves the critical "login bottleneck" for browser agents that previously required users to hand over raw passwords.

4. Browser-use — An open-source library and cloud platform that makes websites accessible to AI agents by simplifying the DOM into manageable actions. Why it fits: Founded in late 2024, it has seen explosive viral growth in the open-source community as a lightweight, plug-and-play alternative to heavier browser automation frameworks.

5. New Computer (Dot) — An OS-level personal AI agent that runs in the background, remembering user context and connecting data across different desktop applications. Why it fits: Founded in 2024 by former Apple designers; strong signal in the consumer OS-agent space, focusing heavily on memory and passive context-gathering rather than just active command execution.

6. Skyvern — An open-source browser automation platform that uses LLMs to navigate complex, dynamic websites without custom scripts. Why it fits: YC W24; gaining rapid enterprise traction for automating tedious web-based procurement and data-entry workflows that traditional RPA bots break on.

7. AgentQL — A query language and API that allows AI agents to reliably locate and interact with web elements using natural language instead of XPath. Why it fits: Emerged from stealth in 2024; highly strategic infrastructure play that fixes the deterministic reliability problem of browser agents hallucinating button locations.

8. Aide — A native, OS-level desktop AI agent for macOS that sees your screen and automates local workflows across native apps. Why it fits: Very early stage (2024 cohort); represents the shift from browser-only agents to local OS agents, utilizing multimodal vision models to interact with the desktop exactly like a human would.

9. E2B — Secure, long-running cloud sandboxes designed specifically for OS-level AI agents to execute code, use terminal commands, and run software. Why it fits: Raised a seed round in 2024; they are becoming the default "operating system environment" for autonomous coding agents that need a safe place to act without destroying the user's local machine.

10. Twin Labs — A headless browser automation platform designed from the ground up for AI agents to execute complex, multi-step web tasks. Why it fits: Raised early-stage funding in 2024; strong signal in the European AI ecosystem, focusing on enterprise-grade reliability for agentic web workflows.

***

The 2 Most Interesting White-Space Gaps

1. Local-First, Privacy-Preserving OS Agents: Almost all current OS-level agents (like Aide or Anthropic's Computer Use feature) rely on taking continuous screenshots of the user's desktop and sending them to cloud-based multimodal LLMs (like GPT-4o or Claude 3.5 Sonnet). This creates a massive privacy and compliance bottleneck for enterprise adoption. There is a massive gap for an OS-agent startup utilizing highly optimized, on-device Small Language Models (SLMs) to parse screen context locally, only pinging the cloud for complex reasoning tasks stripped of PII.

2. Cross-Device Agentic State Management: Currently, browser and OS agents are siloed to the device they are running on (a desktop agent cannot hand off a task to a mobile agent). There is a white-space opportunity for an "Agentic iCloud"—a state-management layer that allows an AI agent to start a task on a user's macOS desktop, hit a 2FA mobile roadblock, seamlessly hand the context over to an iOS-level agent to approve the prompt, and finish the workflow.

Grok 4.6
$0.004 · 12s · 534 tokens

I can’t give you exactly 10 real companies that match founded after 2024 without inventing or guessing dates. That cutoff is too tight for public, verifiable next-gen browser/OS-level agent startups, and I won’t fabricate names or founding years.

What I can do: if you relax to 2023–2025 (or “publicly launched 2024+”), I can source a real list with one-liners and why they fit. Or name a few I’m reasonably sure of and stop short of 10.

White-space gaps (from trying to source this):

  1. Almost no clearly OS-level (not just Chromium/Electron) agent companies with a post-2024 founding date in the public record—most “OS agent” work is still labs, incumbents, or 2023–24 shells.
  2. Very little non-Chrome, non-cloud-browser agent infra (native desktop/mobile OS control with a real company formed in 2025).

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Grok 4.6, overall

Across 30 judged battles, Gemini 3.1 Pro won 10, Grok 4.6 won 15, and 5 were ties. On company discovery alone: 9 to 1.

Costs are the provider's list prices at the time of the run.